John Conyers is the man. He's admonishing the media to stop covering the fucking runaway bride that has absolutely consequence for the country and instead, cover this:
"The London Times reports that the British government and the United States government had secretly agreed to attack Iraq in 2002, before authorization was sought for such an attack in Congress, and had discussed creating pretextual justifications for doing so."
Hello!! PNAC, anyone? Lies and falsification? This is an outrage and is so beyond the pale that 1)this happened and 2)the mainstream media is not saying word one about it.
And I felt dirty today because Bush visited my home state today...where he had this to say:
"If you're getting a social security check today, you're going to keep getting your check, I don't care what the propogandists say."
Well, it takes one to know one...and by the way, if you clicked the link to the WLBT "story"--what the fuck kinda piss poor jackassery is that? "Bush made his mark on the state?" "There was no beating around the Bush?" Bush put forth ideas to "Reform [sic] the system?"
The word "reform" means to change something for the better. Bush wants to "deform" the system. For an exhausting yet lucid discussion on Social Security and semantics, see the Daily Howler...
No comments:
Post a Comment