IRAN: ANYTHING SEEM "FISHY" ABOUT THIS TO YOU?
Does this sound like a fisherman to you? The following sentence is attributed in quotes to a "fisherman":
"Two boats, each with a crew of six to eight multinational forces, were searching Iraqi and Iranian boats Friday morning in Ras al-Beesha area in the northern entrance of the Arab Gulf, but big Iranian boats came and took the two boats with their crews to the Iranian waters."
Here's the account of who the "fisherman" is and how he came to tell the official story in one detailed yet concise sentence:
"A fisherman who said he was with a group of Iraqis from the southern city of Basra fishing in Iraqi waters in the northern area of the Gulf said he saw the Iranian seizure. The fisherman, reached by telephone by an AP reporter in Basra, declined to be identified because of security concerns."
Does that seem the least bit, um, fishy to anyone else?
"Border incidents" are the perfect way to start illegal wars. Especially when the border is disputed! They're a perfect excuse for starting wars! Look how effectively they were used to start the Mexican War, the Israel-Lebanon War of last year, WWII (the Gleiwitz incident--Operation Himmler), and so forth and so on.
When we will frigging learn?