tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6817465.post6251819612853389788..comments2023-11-02T05:43:43.569-07:00Comments on Left-Handed Leftist: LHLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15239320236309335507noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6817465.post-11304453597351942432007-03-31T19:50:00.000-07:002007-03-31T19:50:00.000-07:00"...full tanks of jet fuel were burning inside the..."...full tanks of jet fuel were burning inside these buildings at temperatures higher than normal building fires."<BR/><BR/>Just wanted to clarify something: No plane hit WTC building 7. The FEMA report didn't put forward any explanation except that there was a lot of diesel fuel in WTC 7, and the probability that it was the cause was unlikely. The official 9/11 commission report totally ignored WTC7. Watching the video of WTC7 collapsing, knowing there is still no explanation, and not questioning whether it was rigged for demolition---that's truly sticking your head in the sand.<BR/><BR/>Many people can keep a secret. Many people kept D-Day secret before we launched it. Nobody heard of Operation Northwoods before the documents were released several decades after the fact. And besides, not a lot of people had to know...most of the involved parties probably thought they were participating in a drill...until they saw what happened on CNN with the rest of us. Now, if you were participating in a drill and it turned out to really happen, and something you did was responsible for a disaster on this scale...I dunno, but I think I'd lay low and keep my mouth shut till it all blew over. Of course, very respectfully, just my $.02. Just, to me, foul play fits the evidence I've seen better than the official story, and I'm curious...JoeChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04666354789291684470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6817465.post-1942967940869279352007-03-16T10:41:00.000-07:002007-03-16T10:41:00.000-07:00Ok...I think you're reaching here...First, you say...Ok...I think you're reaching here...<BR/><BR/>First, you say that fire did not bring the building down. Let's remember that full tanks of jet fuel were burning inside these buildings at temperatures higher than normal building fires. Also, let's remember that these buildings were built prior to new safety requirements for protecting steel girders. These girders melted and twisted under extreme heat and pressure from the floors above and caused a collapse upon itself.<BR/><BR/>If the towers fell over to the side, would that convince you that no other means were used to bring the towers down? Just the fact that they looked like controlled demolitions (like we see on tv when they bring down a casino) doesn't mean that's what did it. <BR/><BR/>And secondly, this would have to be a MASSIVE cover up with the ENTIRE government to allow demolition charges to be planted on buildings that were such a major fixture of NYC. The scale of this "supposed" cover-up is mind-boggling. Am I to believe that there are that many corrupt people and that no one, not even ONE person, would have second thoughts and talk? This idea is ridiculous to say the least.<BR/><BR/>Bush may be an idiot and a horrible president, but he would have had to plan something of this scale long before he even became president (I know you aren't saying he did, I'm just making a point). Maybe it's the vast right wing conspiracy that Hillary's talking about!<BR/><BR/>Anyway, that's my take on this. Thanks for engaging in the conversation.<BR/><BR/>LarryGAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com